Re: Upstream SPEC files - was: Re: patch applied without package maintainers' approve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 17.11.2020 18:45, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Just because it's easier not to follow expected process doesn't mean
>> they shouldn't.
>
> Patching packages by proven packages is a completely normal workflow.

Something being normal doesn't mean it's good.

>> If waiting too long is a problem, set a timeout - send a PR, if it's
>> not merged in two weeks then provenpackager it in.
>
> Waiting for 2 weeks is too much, IMO.

Consider making less urgent changes, then.  Provenpackager policy says
that you should check with maintainers before applying patches.

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux