Dne 16. 11. 20 v 9:09 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a): >> This is actually a good idea. I have lots of such spec files. >> >> Is it a good idea to document this in Packaging Guidelines? > It is already in the guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_maintenance_and_canonicity Nope. This section describes what is the primary (canonical) location for **Fedora** and that it is maintainer responsibilty to forward-port chenges from dist-git to upstream. When upstream of spec file exist. But the section does not mention how to indicate that the upstream of SPEC file exists and that other maintainers MAY send PR to that upstream if it is not urgent. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
