On 11/16/20 10:23 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 16. 11. 20 v 9:09 Elliott Sales de Andrade napsal(a):
This is actually a good idea. I have lots of such spec files.
Is it a good idea to document this in Packaging Guidelines?
It is already in the guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_maintenance_and_canonicity
Nope. This section describes what is the primary (canonical) location for **Fedora** and that it is maintainer
responsibilty to forward-port chenges from dist-git to upstream. When upstream of spec file exist.
But the section does not mention how to indicate that the upstream of SPEC file exists and that other maintainers MAY
send PR to that upstream if it is not urgent.
If it is not urgent, provnpackagers should not go and make packaging changes
without talking to the maintainer first.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
