On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 20:47 +0800, Honggang LI wrote: > > > > In terms of "upstream" I'm not sure what you mean there, because > > https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/blob/master/redhat/rdma-core.spec > > It is the "upstream" spec file. This kind of "oh, the *real* spec file is in another castle" approach is just impractical for distributions. It's always a problem, but it's *especially* a problem if the distribution spec file does not indicate the existence of the "upstream" spec in any way. As is the case here. You cannot expect another Fedora packager to look at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rdma-core/blob/master/f/rdma-core.spec and know that there is an "upstream" of that file, because *nothing in it tells them that there is*. If you're going to have this kind of "upstream" spec file...well, I wish you wouldn't. But if you do, *AT MINIMUM*, the "downstream" spec files need to have a clear explanation that there is an "upstream" spec file, with a justification as to why, and a link to it. At the very top. Otherwise there is no chance any other Fedora packager is going to find it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
