Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julen Landa Alustiza <jlanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
>> To me that's the all point of this 
>> process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and  then look at 
>> the different options.
>> 
>
> Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git 
> forges on features? The ODF says that this is one of the problem. Well, 
> imo we don't *really* *really* need to compete with them.
>
> Actually we already have the features that we *really* *really* need. 
> Otherwise we could not release fedora using pagure as we are using, 
> could we? :)

We don't have per-branch default assignees, which is actually a pretty
big problem in Fedora (especially with EPEL packages).

Thanks,
--Robbie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux