On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > (snip) > > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen: > >To me that's the all point of this process, let's put down what we > >*really* *really* need and then look at the different options. > > > > Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git > forges on features? The ODF says that this is one of the problem. > Well, imo we don't *really* *really* need to compete with them. > > Actually we already have the features that we *really* *really* > need. Otherwise we could not release fedora using pagure as we are > using, could we? :) So let's revert the question, pagure does the what it needs to do and enough of it, otherwise we would not be using it. What does pagure miss that other solutions have and that could be considered a requirement? It could be that we don't **need** pagure to do anything more than what it does today, which moves the discussion off a technical ground. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
