On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And ... you lost me right there... > Pierre That's too bad. Even If it's sounds harsh it's the reality. It has been discussed before and there was no technical reason not to. Just someone going for a short term solution. Maybe it is time for someone who works at redhat to stand up going to the manager dude or dudeline (which is a support role just like HR btw.) and explain why the current solution is/has/will(be-en) inferior,and is hurtful to the Linux ecosystem as a whole and a very bad long term solution. The only thing that is at the same time a plus and a minus for a rh manager would be that other distributions will benefit as well (and maybe giving credit to someone else as it was not developed in house). Anyone who spends objectively more than 30 minutes with the two systems will understand and be able to confirm. OBS is an example of KISS. The web interface attracting contributors. Different repo's for different versions and build targets like Qt could use currently. Compare COPR with OBS. Some people may not like the sound of that but I believe that every word of that is true. Br, Damian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
