Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot
<nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le 2018-11-26 12:31, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
>
> >
> > I agree that we need a beta vs stable pathway, but I am not sure
> > having a release helps us.
>
> If we want hardware manufacturers to ship Fedora-compatible hardware we
> need to ship them official Fedora starting points. "Just pick any",
> spend months QAing, and then get told you didn't choose the right
> starting point won't fly with them.

I don't think that formal releases and "pick any random thing you
like" represents the full range of options here.  We have a "stable
stream and we have a beta stream" is neither of those but does provide
clarity.

regards,

bex

>
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot



-- 
Brian (bex) Exelbierd | bexelbie@xxxxxxxxxx | bex@xxxxxxxxx
Fedora Community Action & Impact Coordinator
@bexelbie | http://www.winglemeyer.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux