Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0100, you wrote:

>I understand this argument, but I think more and more desktop users
>are being trained that updates happen on a schedule they didn't choose
>and are hard to avoid.  This is how most mobile operating systems
>function. 

iOS prompts you for the yearly updates, and it can be avoided if you
really want.

macOS requires you to specifically choose the yearly update, though
they may have changed with Mojave.

Not sure about Android, but the fact that Google has had to twist
things into a knot to try and get updates out to users indicates that
upgrades to Android aren't being pushed out for the most part.

Windows is the only one forcing upgrades, and it is perhaps one of the
reasons that hardware vendors are showing more interest in Linux as
people are now more willing to consider anything other than Windows.

Really, the only place where forced upgrades are happening, are
accepted, and seem to actually work are on the application side and
that is because, demonstrated by the web browsers, frequent updates
can be done unobtrusively and reliably.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux