Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> I think the problem is that for a consumer / desktop oriented product
> - which we seem to be talking about given that this appears to be
> driven in part by the desire of hardware vendors - the RHEL/CentOS
> release cycle leads to problems for several years worth of hardware
> releases.
> 
> If you are a hardware vendor would you want to be releasing a laptop
> running CentOS 7.x today, with its outdated versions of much of the
> software (that is a value to the enterprise server market, but less so
> consumer)?

But the same goes for ANY LTS distribution!

No distro is going to do LTS releases with 37 month support every 6 months. 
It would mean supporting 7 releases at once!

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux