On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:55:45PM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > That's my thinking, too. Having releases supported for 7 months is not > really worth it, let's rather switch to a stable rolling release for > those who want the latest and greatest. LTS will be there for the rest. > And the rolling release version can also serve as a stream of apps for > LTS releases. We can build the latest Firefox with the latest stable > Fedora bits and provide it on LTS releases as a flatpak. A single build > for all releases. The model may actually even be easier for > maintainers. I think the very, very high fast rate I'm seeing in the mirror stats (see https://twitter.com/mattdm/status/1063058469903839232) recently supports the idea of a rolling release to cater to a lot of our audience. I wouldn't necessarily have said that three years ago -- look at the upgrade curve for f23 at the left side of the graph. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
