Dne 6.3.2018 v 19:26 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On 03/06/2018 07:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:58:45PM +0000, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > ...snip... >>> But that has its own issues. >> Sorry, just to be clear, what would have its own issues: >> - asking rawhide users to use distro-sync instead of update? >> - automatically have dnf detect it's running in rawhide and default to >> distro-sync instead of update? >> - or.. ? > I'll note that this has come up before in the past after we had > distro-sync, and I tried here to use distro-sync instead of update on my > rawhide laptop, and I ran into issues. Unfortunately, it's been a while > so I can't fully recall what the problem was, but I do remember > distro-sync failed and I had to use update. I can give it a try again > and see if things are any better. > > Do note that distro-sync can downgrade packages, but can't handle all > the cases. ie, upgrade postgresql and update all your data you can't > just downgrade the rpm and be fine. Or any number of other scriptlets > that do things that cannot easily be reversed. Never really used distro-sync, but this is the difference between distro-sync and update: ~~~ $ LANG=C.UTF-8 sudo dnf update Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms', disabling. Last metadata expiration check: 1:08:01 ago on Thu Mar 8 08:45:26 2018. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both fedora-release-29-0.1.noarch and fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch conflicts with fedora-release provided by fedora-release-29-0.1.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.3.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch Problem 2: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both fedora-release-29-0.1.noarch and fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch conflicts with fedora-release provided by fedora-release-29-0.1.noarch - package fedora-release-workstation-29-0.1.noarch requires fedora-release = 29-0.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.3.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package fedora-release-workstation-28-0.2.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.3.noarch - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.3.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both fedora-repos-29-0.1.noarch and fedora-repos-28-0.3.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package fedora-repos-28-0.3.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.3.noarch - package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.3.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-repos-28-0.3.noarch requires fedora-gpg-keys = 28-0.3, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both fedora-gpg-keys-29-0.1.noarch and fedora-gpg-keys-28-0.3.noarch - cannot install the best update candidate for package fedora-gpg-keys-28-0.3.noarch =============================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Installing: kernel x86_64 4.16.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc29 rawhide 88 k kernel-core x86_64 4.16.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc29 rawhide 25 M kernel-modules x86_64 4.16.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc29 rawhide 28 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 4.16.0-0.rc3.git4.1.fc29 rawhide 2.3 M Upgrading: doublecmd-gtk x86_64 0.9.0-0.svn8018.fc29 vondruch-doublecmd 8.9 M gstreamer1-libav x86_64 1.13.1-2.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 5.8 M mpv x86_64 0.28.2-2.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 1.0 M opencore-amr x86_64 0.1.5-3.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 180 k rpmfusion-free-release noarch 28-0.4 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 20 k rpmfusion-nonfree-release noarch 28-0.4 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide 20 k vo-amrwbenc x86_64 0.1.3-4.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 77 k x264-libs x86_64 0.152-4.20171224gite9a5903.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 575 k xvidcore x86_64 1.3.4-5.fc28 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 267 k Removing: kernel x86_64 4.15.0-1.fc28 @rawhide 0 kernel-core x86_64 4.15.0-1.fc28 @rawhide 58 M kernel-modules x86_64 4.15.0-1.fc28 @rawhide 26 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 4.15.0-1.fc28 @rawhide 2.1 M Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): fedora-gpg-keys noarch 29-0.1 rawhide 95 k fedora-release noarch 29-0.1 rawhide 26 k fedora-repos noarch 29-0.1 rawhide 8.1 k generic-release noarch 28-0.3.fc28 rawhide 29 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: fedora-release-workstation noarch 29-0.1 rawhide 20 k rpmfusion-free-release noarch 28-0.4 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 20 k rpmfusion-nonfree-release noarch 28-0.4 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide 20 k Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Install 4 Packages Upgrade 9 Packages Remove 4 Packages Skip 7 Packages Total download size: 72 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. $ sudo dnf distro-sync Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms', disabling. Last metadata expiration check: 1:09:10 ago on Thu Mar 8 08:45:26 2018. Error: Problem 1: package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.3.noarch - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fedora-repos-28-0.3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.4.noarch requires system-release(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-28-0.2.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - package generic-release-28-0.3.fc28.noarch requires fedora-repos(28), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.3.noarch - package fedora-repos-28-0.3.noarch requires fedora-gpg-keys = 28-0.3, but none of the providers can be installed - rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fedora-gpg-keys-28-0.3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository ~~~ It does not appear that distro-sync would try to do any meaningful action on my system. I don't think I am going to try it again in the near future. Vít
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
