Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:54 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 07:35:00PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> So please let us just repeal that "Rawhide can never go backwards"
> >> policy.
> >
> > This is actually a fair point, but I wonder what prevents us from doing it
> > today.
>
> Technically, nothing. This is purely a policy issue.

I'd be curious if there isn't more than just this, or if someone remembers why
that policy was created.


I *think* that the reason for Rawhide not being able to go backwards is simple RPM limitations; if people have updated their system with rawhide packages and encounter a serious bug, if we just roll the updates repo back to the previous working package, the people who upgraded to it have no *automatic* way forwards.

Though, I suppose we could perhaps implement this policy if we special-cased (or simply encouraged) people on Rawhide to use distro-sync instead of simple update. But that has its own issues.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux