On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be
built
twice.
Yes, that is true. Some apps will have to be patched for Flatpak, and
building them as both RPMs and Flatpaks is going to require
conditionals. So there will be some overhead if we support both.
I think that's probably worthwhile. The way I see it, we have a large
number of users who prefer an entirely RPM-based system, although most
users would be better off with an Atomic system and just layering a few
RPMs on top. I suspect we can satisfy both groups of users while doing
only a minimal amount of work. Making patches conditional is not so
hard.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
