On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:02:42PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I think that's probably worthwhile. The way I see it, we have a > large number of users who prefer an entirely RPM-based system, > although most users would be better off with an Atomic system and > just layering a few RPMs on top. I suspect we can satisfy both > groups of users while doing only a minimal amount of work. Making > patches conditional is not so hard. I definitely would like to see as much "magic" and infrastructure support as we can muster for this, so we avoid the complication of SCL macros -- the original idea there was that the same spec files could be used for non-SCL packages, and it got so complex that that didn't really pan out. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
