Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> P.S. On a completely unrelated note... and just brainstorming... so
> long as our Flatpaks are built from RPMs, there's probably no great
> technical reason to get rid of the RPMs, even if Flatpak becomes the
> primary/default distribution mechanism. We mainly just need a way to
> avoid confusion when reporting bugs, since the RPM and Flatpak versions
> of applications could have different bugs.
The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built
twice.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
