Re: Proposal: Rethink Fedora multilib support (Take Two!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:06:24PM -0500, langdon wrote:
> I also am not sure I am comfortable with the move toward exposing
> proprietary software that we have been considering/implementing.
> However, I do think there is some benefit to being able to show
> firefox next to chrome when someone looks to install it. With
> information about the differences. We have no opportunity to educate
> users when they just go to google and download it directly. Again,
> modularity or containers have no bearing on that discussion, they
> are an implementation detail.

N.B. this is referring to yet a separate thing unrelated to *either*
multilib or Modularity; a proposal from Workstation to allow users to
opt-in to selected third-party repositories which may contain
proprietary software. It's a good conversation but *way* off the topic
here. (And I know I'm encouraging the wandering by replying but I just
wanted to make sure that that's clear for anyone following along or
finding this later.)

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux