On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, but the burden of proof always lies with those who want to change
stuff. I've got the easy job here: I just get to say 'look, if you want
to change everything, provide some concrete evidence:
a) that there's a problem
b) that the changes will solve it
c) that they won't create larger problems than the ones they solve'
That's always how it works. You have to provide a justification for
change. No justification is really needed for no-change.
Yup... absolutely true. Change for change sake isn't a reason - and spectral justifications
don't cut it.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
