On Qui, 2016-11-17 at 21:04 +0100, Christian Dersch wrote: > > On 11/17/2016 09:01 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > > On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > Hi, folks! > > > > > > While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which > > > release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one > > > plausible > > > candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually > > > have a > > > policy on what we 'recommend' people to do in this case. > > > > > > You'll notice we don't explicitly specify *how* you should do > > > this. > > > That is, if you're currently running Fedora 23, and you want to > > > upgrade to Fedora 25 next week, are you supposed to: > > > > > > i) Upgrade to Fedora 24 first, then from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25 > > > ii) Upgrade directly to Fedora 25 > > > > > Why not using a similar scheme from Libre Office [1] where Fedora > > 25 is > > the more recent version while Fedora 24 is more stable? > Why consider F24 more stable? Both releases are stable @same level in > general. Because F24 is indeed more stable ? Luya, IMO, give a good point, user may want move to F24 (because is more stable than F25) , so if we can't have choice in Gnome Software, maybe I change my opinion, to the next one ( just because is more stable ) Cheers, -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
