Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks!
>
> While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which
> release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one plausible
> candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually have a
> policy on what we 'recommend' people to do in this case.
>
> You'll notice we don't explicitly specify *how* you should do this.
> That is, if you're currently running Fedora 23, and you want to
> upgrade to Fedora 25 next week, are you supposed to:
>
> i) Upgrade to Fedora 24 first, then from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25
> ii) Upgrade directly to Fedora 25
>
Why not using a similar scheme from Libre Office [1] where Fedora 25 is
the more recent version while Fedora 24 is more stable?

Reference:

[1] https://www.libreoffice.org/download/l

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux