On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Hi, folks! >> >> While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which >> release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one plausible >> candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually have a >> policy on what we 'recommend' people to do in this case. >> >> You'll notice we don't explicitly specify *how* you should do this. >> That is, if you're currently running Fedora 23, and you want to >> upgrade to Fedora 25 next week, are you supposed to: >> >> i) Upgrade to Fedora 24 first, then from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25 >> ii) Upgrade directly to Fedora 25 >> > Why not using a similar scheme from Libre Office [1] where Fedora 25 is > the more recent version while Fedora 24 is more stable? Er... Adam isn't looking to change what the meaning of a release is with this thread. Let's not go off into the weeds to start with and instead focus on what his actual question is. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
