Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/17/2016 09:01 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 17/11/16 10:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, folks!
>>
>> While looking into an issue with how GNOME Software decides which
>> release to offer an upgrade to when there's more than one plausible
>> candidate, I noticed something interesting: we do not actually have a
>> policy on what we 'recommend' people to do in this case.
>>
>> You'll notice we don't explicitly specify *how* you should do this.
>> That is, if you're currently running Fedora 23, and you want to
>> upgrade to Fedora 25 next week, are you supposed to:
>>
>> i) Upgrade to Fedora 24 first, then from Fedora 24 to Fedora 25
>> ii) Upgrade directly to Fedora 25
>>
> Why not using a similar scheme from Libre Office [1] where Fedora 25 is
> the more recent version while Fedora 24 is more stable?
Why consider F24 more stable? Both releases are stable @same level in
general.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux