On 17/09/16 03:27, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 17:19 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Automatically? If I receive a bug upstream, I want to receive it >> without the distribution's embellishments: I want to know what >> *upstream* version of the software was used, how I can reproduce the >> bug using generic installation from sources, and not using the distro >> package, etc. Also, I don't want to read the full history on the >> distribution bugtracker, I want to see a concise summary of >> findings. I want to see an explanation why the bug is an upstream >> bug, >> not a distro-specific thing. The person who is forwarding bugs has to >> all of this by hand, and doing this automatically is infeasible. > > I don't care so much about all that (it's more important for systemd > due to distro integration), I just want the bug reporter CCed on the > upstream bug, and able to respond when I ask a question. Hi, we might be able to extend the External Trackers extension in RH Bugzilla to be able to create as well as sync bugs. We've shared the code with upstream to see if they like our approach so far. Fedora is our biggest user community, so we can certainly make some Fedora specific changes to RH Bugzilla should it be required. Cheers, Jeff. -- Jeff Fearn Senior Software Engineer PnT - DevOps - Development Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd http://dilbert.com/fast/2004-08-17/ PGP Fingerprint: B61A DC52 3E0E B17C 94D7 945C BB37 478C F119 9BCA _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
