Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/13/2016 07:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

That is the crux of the problem with this approach.  It is impossible
for a user to determine which packages have maintainers that look in
RH Bugzilla and which do not.

IMO, it should be mandatory for Fedora maintainers to look into RH Bugzilla, because that's the product they are "maintaining" and what users are using.

Them not looking into RHBZ to me qualifies as them not doing their job as package maintainer.

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux