On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:43:31 -0500 Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 08:33 +0200, Jakub Filak wrote: > > Does GNOME Bugzilla support XMLRPC? Is there any testing instance > > ABRT team > > can play with? > > Yes and yes, but is XMLRPC being removed from upstream Bugzilla? I > think I read that somewhere (but can't find a reference now when I > search). It'd be a bad idea to use it if so. They added a REST api in 5.0 and want people to move to that. "One big addition is a new REST-like endpoint alongside the existing XML-RPC and JSON-RPC endpoints. This will allow clients to access Bugzilla data using standard HTTP calls for easy development. Note: XML-RPC and JSON-RPC are deprecated in favor of REST and will likely be removed in the Bugzilla 7.0 release. " > > One problem I can see is that Fedora users will have to register to > > every > > single upstream bug tracking tool. Using Red Hat Bugzilla as a proxy > > to > > upstream bug tracking tools is pretty convenient. > > I guess Launchpad-style comment proxying is probably too ambitious. Note that hopefully with 5.0 we will have SAML auth, so if bugzilla.gnome.org also picked that up (and other places) people could just login with their Fedora account to all of them. kevin
Attachment:
pgpSVbdchuv32.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
