Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
<snip>
> This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing bugs :-(
> We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their
> bug reports are going to be ignored until Fedora EOL procedure closes
> them :-(
> 
> Even if we can't enhance Red hat Bugzilla, we can at least do more to
> alert users to this so they stand a chance of doing the right thing.
> 
> eg, update the component description to tell user to file in GNOME
> bugzilla instead, and have a bot that adds a comment to any new bugs
> that are still filed, closing them WONTFIX and asking the user to
> re-open against upstream GNOME bugzilla, instead of leaving the bug
> open and ignored until Fedora EOL.

A couple of things could be done to help with that:
- Bring back the x-bugzilla .desktop metadata, and have ABRT file upstream bugs
- Make ABRT reports more useful (right now it's attaches a *lot* of extra
  information, basically everything it can, as files). It's not possible
  to search for parts of backtraces in the query tool.
- More useful templates when filing bugs, explaining where to file RFEs and
  non-packaging bugs. As (for GNOME and a lot of other tools) we simply
  package upstream, it would be most better to point directly to the
  right place to file bugs.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux