Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:03:28 -0500
Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 14:33 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
> > It was the first problem, the one with deja-dup  
> 
> Where did you report the bug? The upstream bug tracker is [1]. If you
> reported it somewhere else, of course you'd be told it's the wrong
> place....
> 
> Unfortunately, I think deja-dup is unmaintained, so reporting bugs is
> not likely to result in fixes. It's not even user-visible, for many
> years, now due to some problem with the appdata file. But there's no
> chance of a fix if the issue isn't reported, so still a good idea....

FYI, I fixed the visibility in gnome-software a while back and the
maintainer applied my patches. 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237364

kevin

Attachment: pgpowZ36E6Lzj.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux