Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/13/2016 11:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:00:32AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> To be clear, the problem is that a small handful of package maintainers
>> (including Bastien) are collectively "responsible" for all of the GNOME
>> and freedesktop components in Fedora (including fprintd), and it's
>> simply not reasonable to expect them to read all the bugs that are
>> assigned to them, let alone take the time to forward them upstream. If
>> you use Red Hat Bugzilla, the right developers may never notice your
>> bug report at all.
>>
>> You have a much better chance filing bugs upstream. You should only use
>> Red Hat Bugzilla for these components if you happen to know there is a
>> specific maintainer who actually looks at the Red Hat bugs for that
>> specific component, or if you're planning to propose it as a release
>> blocker, or if you just don't care whether anybody sees your bug. If
>> you have a packaging bug then it's the right place, but please ping
>> someone to be sure it gets noticed.
>>
>> Of course this is not how Bugzilla is intended to work, but it is how
>> it actually works for GNOME stuff. It's unfortunate, but without some
>> Launchpad-style automatic bug forwarding, this is going to remain the
>> case indefinitely.
> 
> This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing bugs :-(
> We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their
> bug reports are going to be ignored until Fedora EOL procedure closes
> them :-(
> 
> Even if we can't enhance Red hat Bugzilla, we can at least do more to
> alert users to this so they stand a chance of doing the right thing.
> 
> eg, update the component description to tell user to file in GNOME
> bugzilla instead, and have a bot that adds a comment to any new bugs
> that are still filed, closing them WONTFIX and asking the user to
> re-open against upstream GNOME bugzilla, instead of leaving the bug
> open and ignored until Fedora EOL.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> 
Thanks for recognizing this.  I am the OP.  I pretty quickly got a
response suggesting that I file a bug report "upstream".  I did that, or
so I thought, and immediately got a response from someone that it was
the wrong place or list followed by another declaring the matter closed.
I went back to my day job.


-- 
Roger Wells, P.E.
leidos
221 Third St
Newport, RI 02840
401-847-4210 (voice)
401-849-1585 (fax)
roger.k.wells@xxxxxxxxxx
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux