Le 06/11/2012 19:48, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > Hello All. > > 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier <mgautier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> For example, if we start from Fedora20 at beginning of 2014: >> - Fedora20(jan 2014) is a stable release. (Fedora18 eol, actual way of >> doing) >> - Fedora21Preview(jul 2014) is an "unstable" release. (Fedora 19 eol) >> - Fedora21(jan 2015) is a stable release. (Fedora21Preview eol, new way >> of doing) >> - Fedora22Preview(jul 2015) >> - Fedora22(jan 2016) (Fedora22Preview and Fedora20 eol) >> - Fedora23Preview(jul 2016) >> - Fedora23(jan 2017) (Fedora23Preview and Fedora21 eol) > So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers, > should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora > versions instead of 3 right now for more than two years. And that's > all just because you think it's a good idea to spend my personal time > on the rreleases I'm not using anymore. No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo instead of 12. Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates) instead of 12. Regards, Matthieu Gautier > > How about NO? > > https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
