Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

2012/11/6 Jason Brooks <jbrooks@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> For those who upgrade each release (or sooner), a 6mo life span for the
> latest release wouldn't matter. Those who don't want to upgrade every six
> months might well appreciate the two year life span.

They should pay for RHEL.
-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux