Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd recommend asking dcantrell, as he has some good points on this
> > topic. I broadly agree with him that it might well be more or less
> > impossible to smoothly handle a major rewrite of anaconda in our current
> > development process. CCing to make sure he sees this.
> 
> If you are saying that 6 months are a too short time for something
> like this I think I can understand it.
6 months are a too short time. And it was less than 6 months. As can be
seen from the F18 release schedule [1], originally it was about 3 months
between the day F17 was released and the day new Anaconda was expected
to work (F18 Alpha release). We of course didn't start the work on May
29, but since there were significant changes in F17 too at least part of
the team had to fix bugs and make F17 releasable. Also Alpha is not
supposed to be 100% feature complete, but it seemed to me that not
everybody was taking this into account.

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/Schedule

-- 
Vratislav Podzimek

Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux