Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Vratislav Podzimek
<vpodzime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 19:32 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I'd recommend asking dcantrell, as he has some good points on this
>> > topic. I broadly agree with him that it might well be more or less
>> > impossible to smoothly handle a major rewrite of anaconda in our current
>> > development process. CCing to make sure he sees this.
>>
>> If you are saying that 6 months are a too short time for something
>> like this I think I can understand it.
> 6 months are a too short time. And it was less than 6 months. As can be
> seen from the F18 release schedule [1], originally it was about 3 months
> between the day F17 was released and the day new Anaconda was expected
> to work (F18 Alpha release).

Sure in that case you shouldn't have propose it for F18 to begin with
but take your time and introduce it in F19. There is no need for this
rush.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux