On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 15:56 +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > Am 01.11.2012 15:41, schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > > > > We ( QA community ) would benefit from a longer release cycle since we > > need more time to properly test "features" and other vital components > > and arguably the QA part of an feature should FESCO delegate to QA > > community to oversee and handle... > > > Maybe we should think again about switching to a roling release models > for Fedora stable. This would IMHO have some benefits to the whole > community. I didn't want to throw this grenade into the debate, but now someone else has, I'll just note that I was in favour of this before and I'm still in favour of it now. :) Rolling release is a model that makes clear sense for a distribution with the goals that Fedora has. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
