Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 15:56 +0100, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am 01.11.2012 15:41, schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
> > 
> > We ( QA community ) would benefit from a longer release cycle since we
> > need more time to properly test "features" and other vital components
> > and arguably the QA part of an feature should FESCO delegate to QA
> > community to oversee and handle...
> > 
> Maybe we should think again about switching to a roling release models
> for Fedora stable. This would IMHO have some benefits to the whole
> community.

I didn't want to throw this grenade into the debate, but now someone
else has, I'll just note that I was in favour of this before and I'm
still in favour of it now. :) Rolling release is a model that makes
clear sense for a distribution with the goals that Fedora has.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux