On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Heiko Adams <heiko.adams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe we should think again about switching to a roling release models > for Fedora stable. This would IMHO have some benefits to the whole > community. I'm afraid a rolling release model would make it *harder* to make major changes to Fedora, not easier. We've had discussion after discussion about the rolling release model over the past several years, but I don't think the majority of the people who build Fedora and make it work want to move to that model model. If they did, we'd have gone down that row by now. (And, while it's not close to perfect, rawhide is roughly analogous to a rolling release anyway -- enough so that many people are actively using it, even if it causes a little pain from time to time.) In short, bringing the topic of rolling releases up again at this time doesn't help us fix the situation at hand -- it simply distracts us with vague alternatives rather than providing any concrete ideas for making our current feature process better. -- Jared Smith -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
