Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello All.

2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier <mgautier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> For example, if we start from Fedora20 at beginning of 2014:
> - Fedora20(jan 2014) is a stable release. (Fedora18 eol, actual way of
> doing)
> - Fedora21Preview(jul 2014) is an "unstable" release. (Fedora 19 eol)
> - Fedora21(jan 2015) is a stable release. (Fedora21Preview eol, new way
> of doing)
> - Fedora22Preview(jul 2015)
> - Fedora22(jan 2016) (Fedora22Preview and Fedora20 eol)
> - Fedora23Preview(jul 2016)
> - Fedora23(jan 2017) (Fedora23Preview and Fedora21 eol)

So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers,
should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora
versions instead of 3 right now for more than two years. And that's
all just because you think it's a good idea to spend my personal time
on the rreleases I'm not using anymore.

How about NO?

https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux