Re: New release cycle proposal (was Rolling release model philosophy (was ...))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/06/2012 10:55 AM, Matthieu Gautier wrote:

No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo
instead of 12.
Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates)
instead of 12.

The cycle would have to go: stable, preview, preview, stable, and so on to avoid maintaining more than two releases at a time.

If it went back and forth between stable and preview, you'd have three supported releases at once in the second half of year two.


Regards,
Matthieu Gautier


How about NO?

https://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbfshfloal1rpdotto1_1280.jpg




--

@jasonbrooks
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux