Le 06/11/2012 20:05, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > 2012/11/6 Matthieu Gautier <mgautier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> So you not a maintainer but you still suggesting that we, maintainers, >>> should do 2 times more job by supporting several simultaneous Fedora >>> versions instead of 3 right now for more than two years. And that's >>> all just because you think it's a good idea to spend my personal time >>> on the rreleases I'm not using anymore. >> No, I never suggest that. Preview versions have a timelife of 6mo >> instead of 12. >> Stable version have a lifetime of 24mo (12mo for regular updates) >> instead of 12. > Exactly what I'm saying - two times more job. So who's gonna pay us > for the time wasted on supporting distributions we're not using > personally? > > I think you didn't get the maintainers motivation (except those RH > fellows whoi just did the job) - we're doing our part because we're > using Fedora daily. What you're suggesting isn't fun anymore. So > somebody should pay for that. Hum.. It should be some misunderstanding somewhere : For security updates: - First half of the year : 2 versions to maintain (+1 version in dev) => As usual - Second half of the year : 3 versions to maintain (+1 version in dev) => Ok, more work, but definitively not 2 times more For other updates: - First half of the year : 1 version to maintain (+1 in dev) => Less work - Second half of the year : 2 versions to maintain (+1 in dev) => As usual *Regards* Matthieu Gautier -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
