Re: Proposal for revitalizing the sponsorship process for packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il giorno 28 aprile 2012 00:10, Stanislav Ochotnicky ha scritto:
> Package review is a good thing, no matter how
> skilled the packager is. Guidelines change,
> people miss things (such as bundling, licensing issues, wrong
> permissions, etc.). I will put it bluntly: getting rid of package
> reviews would be an incredibly stupid thing to do.

I completely agree with you. To go back to initial proposal of
revitalizing sponsor role, I think it would also be a good thing,
given that we leverage on new possible sponsor responsibilities
(ie, supervise new sponsorees' commits for X time after package
creation, not just step in when there is something to fix).
More sponsors should bring more control, not easier membership.

--
Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx>
Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) (Italy)
3 Baltic Circuit - 3030 Point Cook - VIC (Australia)
Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18 GMT+12)
Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337  DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux