Quoting Michael Schwendt (2012-04-26 18:36:51) > So, what has been proposed before (years ago even) is for advanced > packagers (aka "provenpackagers" or experienced packagers) to lower the > hurdle and trust them more in that they know their stuff. They would not > need to wait for somebody else (possibly a fresh packager) to > review'n'approve a package or just its licensing. It's considered > ridiculous by some that "senior packagers" still need approval for > even simple new packages or package renames. I am a provenpackager and I would be *extremely* dissapointed if this came to become a reality. Package review is a good thing, no matter how skilled the packager is. I have packaged quite a few packages, mostly Java ones (65 to be exact) and I still make mistakes! Guidelines change, people miss things (such as bundling, licensing issues, wrong permissions, etc.). I will put it bluntly: getting rid of package reviews would be an incredibly stupid thing to do. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
