Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

RS> Yes. If the informal review is for an existing packager then,
RS> there's no guarantee that a sponsor will even see that informal
RS> review because there's no requirement for a sponsor to approve the
RS> review request in that scenario.

You must have misunderstood.  Any chance you could re-read what I wrote,
noting "for the packages you have submitted" where you seem to have
replaced the last word with "reviewed".

To be painfully verbose, you include the relevant information in _your_
ticket.  As in:

   Here's my new package submission.  I need a sponsor.  Please note
   that I'm a long-time Fedora ambassador and am the upstream developer
   for this software.  Please also see the following informal reviews I
   have done:
     link to ticket 1
     link to ticket 2

 - J<
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux