Re: Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> RS> How does someone who needs to be sponsored make sure that their
> RS> informal reviews get noticed? Not everyone will 'toot their own
> RS> horn' so to speak. That doesn't mean they are not a good prospect as
> RS> a packager.
>
> Well, the documentation says to include that information in the review
> tickets for the package(s) you have submitted, along with all other
> relevant information which would help a sponsor in making their
> decision.  In what way do you think that is insufficient?

Yes. If the informal review is for an existing packager then, there's
no guarantee that a sponsor will even see that informal review because
there's no requirement for a sponsor to approve the review request in
that scenario.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux