On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> "RS" == Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > RS> Yes. If the informal review is for an existing packager then, > RS> there's no guarantee that a sponsor will even see that informal > RS> review because there's no requirement for a sponsor to approve the > RS> review request in that scenario. > > You must have misunderstood. Any chance you could re-read what I wrote, > noting "for the packages you have submitted" where you seem to have > replaced the last word with "reviewed". > > To be painfully verbose, you include the relevant information in _your_ > ticket. As in: > > Here's my new package submission. I need a sponsor. Please note > that I'm a long-time Fedora ambassador and am the upstream developer > for this software. Please also see the following informal reviews I > have done: > link to ticket 1 > link to ticket 2 Yes, that's certainly one way to do it, and is even mentioned in the "How to get sponsored" wiki[1]: "Go ahead and link to other package review requests where you've left comments and reviews (More on reviews below)." but that's a separate problem. The shear amount of documentation/guidelines there are. Richard [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Submitting_quality_new_packages -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
