On 11/22/2011 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > 2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be > blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or manually - > until the PT modified the feedback or it was overridden by someone with > appropriately godlike powers (TBD, but probably not just the maintainer) Hum I thought the proven tester concept was being dropped anyway. A) Have maintainers for critical path component provided test cases for proven tester to use to test to differentiate them from fas-tester and the "I installed this update and continued to use my system as normal and did not note any regressions'"? B) Has the scalability problem be solved as in the required minimum amount of active proven testers has been met for this to actually work? JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
