Am 14.06.2011 01:49, schrieb Kevin Kofler: > I also miss those kernel upgrades. I think we've become much too > conservative. and the combination is which i really not understand * kernel -> conservative * kde4/gnome3/systemd -> go ahead with all consquences and the kernel is really not a big deal because the updates are normally not invasive > All this "4.0 is only for developers" messaging came way too late. We had > already worked hard on making everything work with 4.0 in pre-F9 Rawhide at > that point. the mistake happended long before! as KDE4.0 was anounced for F9 nobody did know if they are ready and which state kde4 would have in the first release > We also worked really hard to make 4.0 work as well as possible. I made > several (completely unpaid!) 30+ hour days to build bugfix releases, fix > showstoppers etc. The other KDE SIG developers also worked for many hours on > that stuff. We were able to ship Fedora 9 with no true showstopper and we > fixed the most annoying bugs in updates before or within days of the > release. nobod said that there was no hard work but is it really needed to decide major upgrades without knwoing what state the software finally would have instead take a breath and fixing existing bugs since every 6 months is a new release and no reason to hurry it would be really a godd idea to take every second release only for bugfixing and kernel-upgrades for hardware-support and only every econd release to bring new stuff - there are so many small bugs and edges everywhere that there is no need for such a hurry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
