Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:19 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
> > >From whom it was gathered?
> > What was the question?
> > What was the answer?
> > 
> > - Gilboa
> > 
> > 
> 
> Most likely by reading or participating in the various threads on
> subjects that have happened on this list and the FAB list and the
> desktop list and others.  It seems to be a rather big assumption that
> board decisions are made in a vacuum.

It seems that we don't share the same definition of community input and
community involvement.

For the sake of the Fedora project, I do hope that you're right and I'm
wrong.

- Gilboa

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux