Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
> > achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
> > 
> What makes you think that no community input is considered?

Let me reverse the question: How did they gather the community input?
>From whom it was gathered?
What was the question?
What was the answer?

- Gilboa


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux