On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a): > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by one of > > > > +1 The Hall Monitor Policy is cancer. > > +1000 it feels to me like in a bad old Communism when the open debate > was allowed only when it didn't touch the leading role of the Communist > Party. I really don't think anybody in this thread said anything so > sacrilegious that the thread should be terminated. Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new thread added *nothing* new to the discussion. Frankly, it was more deserving to be on Slashdot more than the fedora-devel list. The Hall Monitors were totally justified in killing this one imo, and frankly if folks want more repetitive flame-bait threads like that I've got zero interest in staying subscribed to it. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
