On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 20:34:57 +0300, > Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thus far, it seemed that the both the user and the developer communities > > were left out of these proceedings, and everything was more-or-less > > decided by FESCO, which left (large?) parts of the developer community > > feeling left out. > > The board has been trying to answer questions related to this (who is Fedora > for). And I think they recently completed that task. I think the next thing > up would be to look at how well we are or aren't serving the people who > Fedora is supposed to be for. > > A good starting point for this work is at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Unfinished_Board_issues > > There is a board election coming up and it is a good time to ask prospective > board members questions related to the future of Fedora. I believe you missed my point. I don't claim that the board ignored this issue. Far from it. I am claiming that having the board make this decision without the involving of the community is slowly (?) driving both developers and users away. As for the coming FESCO election, I may be alone on this matter, but even though I took the time to read the nominees mission statement, I can't say that I really know what each nominee think about this issue. This more-or-less negates the effectiveness of using the coming FESCO election as a policy changer. (Though as I said, I may be alone on this issue) - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
