Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/10/2010 12:37 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 20:34:57 +0300,
>   Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Thus far, it seemed that the both the user and the developer communities
>> were left out of these proceedings, and everything was more-or-less
>> decided by FESCO, which left (large?) parts of the developer community
>> feeling left out.
>>     
> The board has been trying to answer questions related to this (who is Fedora
> for). And I think they recently completed that task. I think the next thing
> up would be to look at how well we are or aren't serving the people who
> Fedora is supposed to be for.
>   

They already have the results at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User_base

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux