On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 22:11 +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote: > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Gilboa Davara <gilboad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we, as a -community- project, want to remain relevant, it is time to > > decide who we are and what is our goal. > > Agreed. The who we are is easy answered, we're RHs *playground*. That > is what everyone, not completely new to Linux, knows and one problem > why we're at 1.3% as mentioned above. Something that other distros > don't have to suffer from. And we're gladly acting like it, e.g. > x-server not compatible with HW vendor drivers at release time > (believe it or not, but users were angry about it). Bleeding edge > stuff like PA as first, ready or not for the masses. > One of the most frequented link in #fedora was/is > http://fedorasolved.org/Members/fenris02/pulseaudio-fixes-and-workarounds > Just two examples. > > No wonder we're at about 1.3% eh ;) > I have no problems with being RH playground, nor with the 1.3%. RH puts a lot of resources into Fedora and it entitled to use these resources as they see fit. Never the less, this "playground" is huge. You can have anything from a extra-unstable Debian-Sid to a Ubuntu-LTS. This big question is: Who we are, and who gets to decide it. - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
